OK, I need to trim down my portfolio in order to upload more work.  Please review my port and any picture rated 2 or less (which won't show on the front page) will be up for deletion (and with it your rating).  There will be no counter rating, I just need to create some space so if there are pictures that really don't appeal, fire away.  That said, if you pick them all, I may take it with a pinch of salt!

Thank you in advance.  Oh, and if anyone wants a shoot, give me a shout.

Glenn

GCImages , Photographer  posted on 14/09/2011 22:57:52   Posted 677 times

Located:Gloucestershire,Hampshire, UK
Member Since: 03/10/2009

If I am honest...

and at the end of the day its the best policy.... you got some stinkers in here mate but you have some absoloute stunners in here too... If these were prints on my desk I would bet cash money they were 2 different photographers work.

The further down your portfolio you go the better your images are...

So... the following are below even average within your port so I'd chop these, no explaination except they just dont stack up to your other work...

#103526  
#103384
#102781
#102257
#102254
#98819
#103310
#99421
#98461     

#103279 is just a tighter crop of #102463 so lose one
#102608 is over exposed, maybe intentionally, but it dont work and you have better images from this shoot.

Your portfolio really dont come alive until row 6! (The last image on row 5 of bink is good)

Row 7 keep the 2 end images #101604 and #101236

rows 13, 14 and 15 I would keep #98140, #98751, #98105 and im wavering on #98912


bottom 6 rows are fine except #98349 IMHO.

There you go :-)

I think the stuff you have done with Madamebink is quality, your artistic nudes are classy with good lighting

I think you are an artistic/creative photographer, your lifestyle and commercial stuff is not even in the same league.


There you go :-)

Dont kick me too hard mate... You did ask.

N.


Cheers

Big Nige

P.S - I'm waffling again aren't I

nwpp , Photographer  posted on 14/09/2011 23:39:36   Posted 544 times

Located:Sittingbourne,Kent, UK
Member Since: 25/03/2009

Thanks Nige, very much appreciated.  I veto'd 1 on the basis that it has been up for less than 24 hours.

The rest are gonners!  Anyone else?

GCImages , Photographer  posted on 15/09/2011 00:17:36   Posted 677 times

Located:Gloucestershire,Hampshire, UK
Member Since: 03/10/2009

So many great images it's a tough call, but eventually somethings have to go...



For what its worth here is my selection for the cut.



I started off rating and commenting in the port and it kept swapping images in some random way, so here is my suggested list:



101571        Twin Print ?

99422        Blown on face

99537        Blown by ear

100172        Lesser of the series

99974        Lesser of series

99189        Not up to standard

98105        confusing

98987        lost eye contact

96702        HiLites in eyes too big

96689        Awkward Pose

97559        Looks most unhappy

98314        ????



Cheers



Graham

Thanks Graham,

They be gone!

Glenn

GCImages , Photographer  posted on 15/09/2011 17:37:55   Posted 677 times

Located:Gloucestershire,Hampshire, UK
Member Since: 03/10/2009